DNA coding for a Mg2+/H+ or Zn2+/H+ exchanger and transgenic plants expressing same

ABSTRACT

An isolated DNA molecule is provided coding for a polypeptide of the 11-12 transmembrane domain transporter family having a Mg 2+ /H +  or Zn 2+ /H +  exchange activity, herein designated MHX. The genomic MHX DNA was isolated from  Arabidopsis thaliana  cv. C-24. Transgenic plants transformed with said DNA and expressing MHX are shown to have a lower content of sodium as compared with corresponding wild-type plants or a higher dry matter weight upon growth in calcium-rich media as compared with corresponding wild-type plants. These transgenic plants are tolerant to stress conditions, particularly high salinity and calcium-rich media, e.g. saline and calcareous soils.

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates in general to DNA molecules encoding a new polypeptide of the 11-12 transmembrane domain transporter family having a Mg²⁺- or Zn²⁺-proton exchange activity, expression vectors comprising them, plant cells transformed thereby and transgenic plants expressing same.

In all living organisms, cellular functions require a fine homeostasis of various ions and nutrients, including Mg²⁺ and Zn²+. Mg²⁺ is required for the function of manv enzymes (e.g., phosphatases, ATPases. RNA polymerases). Zn²⁺ plays both a functional (catalytic) and structural role in several enzyme reactions, and is involved in the regulation of gene expression by zinc-finger proteins. Both Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ are essential for the structural integrity of ribosomes. In plants, Mg²⁺ is also an essential component of chlorophyll, and regulates the activity of key chloroplastic enzymes.

Multicellular organisms have to balance not only their Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ intake and intracellular compartmentalization. but also the distribution of these ions to various organs. The movement of ions through membrane barriers is mediated by specialized proteins—channels, transporters or ATPases. Thus far, genes encoding Mg²⁺ transporters have been cloned only from bacteria and yeast. The bacterial MgtA and MgtB Mg²⁺ transport proteins are P-type ATPases (Hmiel et al., 1989). Mg²⁺ is also transported by the bacterial CorA and mgtE proteins (Smith et al., 1993; Smith et al., 1995), but the molecular mechanism of Mg²⁺ mobilization by these proteins is not known. Among the Zn²⁺ transport proteins whose genes have been cloned, the bacterial ZntA (Rensing et al., 1997) is a P-type ATPase. Zn²⁺ is also transported by the yeast ZRT 1,2 (Zhao and Eide, 1996a; Zhao and Eide, 1996b), transporters, but the molecular mechanism of Zn²⁺ transport by these proteins is also unknown. A mammalian protein designated DCT1 (Gunshin el al., 1997), which belongs to the Nramp family of macrophage proteins, was suggested to be a symporter of protons with various divalent metal cations, including Fe²⁺ and Zn²⁺, but it was not able to symport Mg²⁺ ions.

Little is known about transport proteins that control. Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ homeostasis in plants. Ions absorbed into the cytosol of root cells diffuse towards the vascular cylinder through plasmodesmata and reach the xylem parenchyma cell layer, which border the xylem vessels. The xylem parenchyrna cells were suggested to play a key role in ion secretion into the xylem (xylem loading), and in the release of ions from the xylem (unloading). These processes require transport through the plasma membrane of the xylem parenchyma cells, but the proteins mediating xylem loading and unloading of Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ are not known. Unloaded Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ subsequently enter the surrounding cells through unknown transport proteins. The molecular mechanisms of phloem loading and unloading with Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ have also not been elucidated. Intracellularly, the vacuole is considered the main organelle mediating Mg²⁺ homeostasis in the cytosol and the chloroplast. Vacuolar Mg²⁺ is also important for the cation-anion balance and turgor regulation of cells. The activity of a Mg²⁺/H⁺ antiporter was identified in lutoid (vacuolar) vesicles of Hevea brasiliensis (Amalou et al., 1992; Amalou et al., 1994) and in vacuolar membranes from roots of Zea mays L. (Pfeiffer and Hager, 1993), but cloning of the corresponding genes has not been reported. The Hevea brasiliensis transporter was indicated to be electroneutral, and to be capable of transporting also Zn²⁺ cations. In Zn²⁺ tolerant species, tolerance is achieved mainly through sequestering Zn²⁺ in the vacuoles, but the transport mechanism is not known.

The progressive salinization of irrigated land threatens the future of agriculture in the most productive areas of our planet. Increasingly, intensive irrigation practices are resulting in secondary salinization of agricultural soils. Even water of good quality may contain 100-1000 g salt/m³. With an annual application of 10,000 m³/ha, between 1 and 10 t of salt are added to the soil. As a result of transpiration and evaporation of water, soluble salts further accumulate in the soil. Since crop productivity of irrigated land in many areas is much higher than of non-irrigated land, the coincidence of irrigation and salinization threatens current agricultural productivity. It has been estimated that 10×10⁶ ha per annum of irrigated land are abandoned due to salinization and alkalization. For example, large areas of the Indian subcontinent have been rendered unproductive by salt accumulation and poor water management; in Pakistan, about 10 million of 15 million hectares of canal-irrigated land are becoming saline. Worldwide, about 33% of the irrigated land is affected by salinity, and presumably more land is going out of irrigation due to salinity than there is new land coming into irrigation.

Salinity problems occur also in non-irrigated croplands and rangelands either as a result of evaporation and transpiration of saline underground water or due to salt input from rainfall. The saline areas of the world consist of salt marshes of the temperate zones, mangrove swamps of the subtropics, and their interior salt marshes adjacent to salt lakes. Saline soils are abundant in semiarid and arid regions, where the amount of rainfall is insufficient for substantial leaching.

Soluble salts accumulating in the soil must be removed periodically by leaching and drainage. But even when proper technology is applied to the soils, they contain salt concentrations which often impair the growth of crop plants of low salt tolerance. Most crop species and cultured woody species either have a relatively low salt tolerance, or their growth is severely inhibited even at low substrate salinity. Salinity is the major nutritional constraint on the growth of wetland rice.

In saline soils, NaCl is usually the dominant salt. There are three major constraints for plant growth on saline substrate (Marschner, 1995, p. 662): (1) water deficit (‘drought stress’) arising from the low (more negative) water potential of the rooting medium; (2) ion toxicity associated with the excessive uptake of mainly Cl⁻ and Na⁺; (3) nutrient imbalance, caused by depression in uptake and/or shoot transport and impaired internal distribution of mineral nutrients, and calcium in particular.

In many fruit trees and herbaceous crop species, ion toxicity is characterized by growth inhibition and injury of foliage (marginal chlorosis and necrosis on mature leaves). These phenomena occur even at low levels of NaCl salination, under which water deficit is not a constraint. Many plant species such as citrus and leguminous suffer from Cl⁻ toxicity. The species that suffer most from Na⁺ toxicity are graminaceous such as wheat, sorghum, and rice. Many crop species with relatively low salt tolerance are typical Na⁺ excluders, and are capable at low and moderate salinity levels of restricting the transport of Na⁺ into the leaves where it is highly toxic in salt sensitive species. The causes of salt toxicity in cells are inhibition of enzyme reactions and inadequate compartmentalization between cytoplasm and vacuole. There is also increasing support for the hypothesis of Oertli (1968) of salt accumulation in the leaf apoplasm as an important component of salt toxicity, leading to dehydration and turgor loss and death of leaf cells and tissues.

The mechanism of adaptation of plants to saline substrates is based on the principle that salt tolerance can be achieved by salt exclusion or salt inclusion. Differences in the capacity for Na⁺ and Cl⁻ exclusion exist between cultivars of different species. For example, the higher salt tolerance of certain cultivars of wheat, barley and citrus is related to a more effective restriction of shoot transport of both Na⁺ and Cl⁻. In grapevine, differences in salt tolerance are closely related to the capacity of rootstocks for Na⁺ and Cl⁻ exclusion from the shoots. The capacity for Cl⁻ exclusion seems to be the effect of a major dominant gene and appears to be independent of the ability of Na⁺ exclusion from the shoot. Mechanisms which restrict excessive Na⁺ and Cl⁻ transport to the shoots of plants grown in saline substrates operate at root level (such as membrane properties, anatomical features) and along the pathway from roots to the shoot. It was shown that the stem tissue of certain species can reabsorbe Na⁺ from the xylem sap in periods of ample root supply. Retranslocation of Na⁺ from the shoots to the roots may also contribute to low Na⁺ contents in the shoots of certain species.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The movement of materials, including ions, in biological systems, particularly into and out of cells and across intracellular membrane barriers, is carried out by membrane proteins called transporters. In order to be integrated into the membrane, these transporters contain several hydrophobic domains, known as transmembrane domains or spans, which span on the membrane. Families of transporters are known with 11 or 12 transmembrane domains such as, for example, NCX1, a mammalian Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchanger that plays a major role in extrusion of Ca²⁺ ions to the extracellular space following excitation (Nicoll et al., 1990).

According to the present invention, we have cloned and characterized an Arabidopsis transporter, herein designated MHX, of the amino acid sequence depicted in FIG. 1, a new member of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family that is localized in the vacuolar membrane and functions as an electrogenic exchanger of protons with Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ ions. The gene encoding MHX is the first gene encoding a Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ exchanger that has been cloned so far from any organism.

According to the present invention there is provided an isolated DNA molecule comprising a sequence encoding a polypeptide of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family having a Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity.

The isolated DNA molecule of the invention may be a genomic, complementary or synthetic DNA. In one embodiment, the isolated DNA molecule is the complementary DNA (SEQ ID NOs:1 and 3) depicted in FIG. 2, or the genomic DNA (SEQ ID NO:4) depicted in FIG. 3, from Arabidopsis thaliana cv. C-24, coding for the 539-amino acid polypeptide MHX, a member of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family of the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NOs: 2 and 3) depicted in FIG. 1. Hydropathy analyses using the Eisenberg, Schwarz, Komarony and Wall method revealed 11 putative transmembrane domains marked bold and underlined in FIG. 4, rendering MHX a member of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family.

Besides the shown Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ activity, MHX also has Fe²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity and may be expected to have an exchange activity for proton and other divalent cations such as cadmium, and it may also be involved in other processes in plants such as transport of monovalent cations such as sodium.

According to the present invention there is further provided a chimeric DNA molecule capable of expression in plants comprising: (a) a DNA molecule comprising a sequence encoding a polypeptide of the 11-12 transmembrane domain transporter family having a Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity; and (b) DNA sequences capable of enabling the expression of said polypeptide in plant cells.

The DNA sequences of (b) capable of enabling the expression of said polypeptide in plant cells are, for example, a plant promoter and a plant polyadenylation and termination signal sequence at the 3′ non-translated region of the gene such as the nopaline synthase (nos) transcription terminator signal, and optionally a short DNA sequence at the 3′ end of the promoter for enhanced translation of the mRNA transcribed from the gene such as, for example, the omega (Ω) sequence derived from the coat protein gene of the tobacco mosaic virus (Gallie et al., 1987).

The promoter used according to the invention may be the natural MHX promoter or it is a DNA sequence not existing in nature linked to the MHX gene. The promoter may be a constitutive, organ-specific, tissue-specific, inducible or chimeric promoter. In one preferred embodiment, the promoter is the constitutive 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV35S).

According to the present invention there is further provided an expression vector comprising a chimeric DNA molecule of the invention. An example of such a chimeric DNA molecule is the construct depicted in FIG. 5 herein.

According to the present invention there is further provided a transformed plant cell expressing a polypeptide of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family having a Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity.

According to the present invention there is further provided a transgenic plant whose cells express a DNA molecule comprising a sequence encoding a polypeptide of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family having a Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity, particularly the MHX protein described herein, shown to have a divalent cation-proton exchange activity. Said transgenic plants are shown herein to have a lower content of sodium as compared with corresponding wild-type plants, and to have a higher dry matter weight upon growth in media with increased calcium levels as compared with corresponding wild-type plants. This makes them suitable for growth in calcareous soils, that are characterized by high calcium content that restrict plant growth.

The characteristics of the transgenic plants of the invention render them better adapted at growing under stress conditions. Thus, these transgenes will have an improved tolerance to stress conditions as compared with corresponding wild-type plants, said stress conditions comprising drought, temperature, mineral excess or deficiency, osmotic, pH, oxidant, chemical, pathogenic and, particularly, high salinity and high-calcium (saline and calcareous soils, respectively) stresses.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 depicts the three-letter amino acid sequence of the MHX protein (SEQ ID NO:2).

FIG. 2 depicts the nucleotide sequence of the cDNA (SEQ ID NO:1) encoding the MHX protein.

FIG. 3 depicts the nucleotide sequence of the genomic DNA (SEQ ID NO:4) from Arabidopsis thaliana cv. C-24, coding for the MHX protein.

FIG. 4 depicts the one-letter amino acid sequences of the MHX protein (SEQ ID NO:2) and of the PID:g2529667 protein of Arabidopsis (SEQ ID NO:5) predicted according to an Arabidopsis genomic sequence which is part of locus ATAC002535 (GenBank) defined in the genome project, and the code homology alignment between the two sequences. |: identical amino acid. −: lack of amino acid. The transmembrane domains 1-11 of MHX, as predicted by the Eisenberg, Schwarz, Komarony and Wall method, are indicated by bold underlined letters.

FIG. 5 is a schematic depiction of a chimeric gene of the invention including the strong constitutive CaMV35S promoter, the Ω enhancer of translation, the coding region of the cDNA coding for MHX including the second intron of the genomic DNA and the nopaline synthase (nos) transcription termination and polyadenylation signal (3′).

FIG. 6 shows the intracellular localization of MHX in wild-type Arabidopsis plants. Arabidopsis root membranes were extracted and fractionated in sucrose gradient. The fractions (fraction 1=20% sucrose; fraction 13=45% sucrose) were subjected to Western blot analysis with the following antibodies (Ab): MHX-D—affinity-purified Ab against MHX-derived peptide D (SEQ ID NO: 17); MHX-A—affinity-purified Ab against MHX-derived peptide A (SEQ ID NO:16); VM—Ab against the vacuolar membrane marker VM23; PM—Ab against the Arabidopsis plasma membrane marker protein RD-28; ER—Ab against the endoplasmic reticulum yeast BiP protein.

FIG. 7 shows the intracellular localization of MHX in MHX-transgenic tobacco plants. Membranes were extracted from MHX-transgenic tobacco plants, fractionated in sucrose gradients (fraction 1=20% sucrose; fraction 14=45%) and different fractions were subjected to Western blot analysis with the following antibodies (Ab): MHX—affinity-purified Ab against peptide D; VM—monoclonal Ab against the vacuolar membrane marker H⁺-ATPase; PM—Ab against the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase; ER—Ab as in FIG. 6 above.

FIG. 8 shows expression of MHX in control and MHX-transgenic tobacco plants and tobacco cell suspension cultures. Proteins were extracted from control and MHX-transforrned tobacco plants or cultures and were subjected to Western blot analysis with affinity-purified anti-peptide D antibodies. Lane A—MHX-transgenic culture number 1; Lane B—MHX-transgenic culture number 3; Lane C—control non-transformed culture; Lane D—wild-type non-transformed tobacco plant; Lane E—MHX-transgenic tobacco plant number 9; Lane F—MHX-transgenic tobacco plant number 2.

FIG. 9 is a graph showing proton-gradient dependent divalent cation transport in vacuoles of MHX-transformed tobacco BY-2 cells. The transport activity of MHX was examined in vacuoles and in plasma membranes of wild-type and MHX-transformed tobacco BY-2 cell lines. The pipette solution (pH 7.7) included Mg²⁺, Zn²⁺, Fe²⁺ or Ca²⁺. The Figure represent the currents that were measured in vacuoles two seconds after changing the pH of the bath solution from 7.7 to 5.5. Similar currents in the vacuoles of non-transformed cultures were significantly lower. No currents were detectable using this procedure in plasma membranes.

FIG. 10 shows the ameliorating effect of MHX expression on plant growth in the presence of a high calcium concentration. F1 seeds of M-transformed and non-transformed tobacco plants were surface-sterilized and germinated in tissue-culture plates on Nitsch medium including kanamycin as a selective agent. Ten-day old seedling (of which 2:3 were heterozygous and 1:3 homozygous) were transferred with their intact roots into 15 cm diameter plates containing Nitsch medium (that includes 0.75 mM Mg and 1.5 mM Ca) supplemented with either 10 mM Mg(NO₃)_(2, 30) mM Mg(NO₃)₂, or 30 mM Ca(NO₃)₂. Each plate included 12 plants of the same genotype (either wild-type or transgenic). For each of the different treatments (the different ion supplementation) 4 plates were prepared of wild-type plants, two plates of transgenic plant genotype 2, and two plates of transgenic plants genotype 9. Differences were not observed between the phenotypes of the transgenic genotypes 2 and 9, and therefore they were treated as a single genotype for the statistical analysis. A month later, all the aerial parts of the plants were excised from each plate and the total dry weight of the plants derived from each of the plates was determined. Each column represents the average and the standard deviation of 4 plates, of either the wild-type or the transgenic plants. The growth of both wild-type and transgenic plants grown in the presence of 30 mM Ca was significantly inhibited compared to plants grown on Nitsch medium containing 1.5 mM Ca, but the transgenic plants were significantly less inhibited. The difference between the dry weight of the transgenic and wild-type plants that were grown on the high calcium medium were significant (p<0.05), as indicated by the Anova test.

FIGS. 11A-E show the magnesium, zinc, calcium, sodium and potassium content, respectively, in shoots of MHX-transformed and non-transformed plants. For plants grown in tissue culture, F1 seeds of transformed and non-transformed tobacco plants were surface-sterilized and germinated in tissue-culture plates on Nitsch medium including kanamycin as a selective agent. Ten-day old seedling (of which 2:3 were heterozygous and 1:3 homozygous) were transferred with their intact roots into 15 cm diameter plates containing Nitsch medium supplemented with various minerals (Mg, Zn, Ca) as indicated in FIGS. 11A-E. The plants were grown further for 1 month. Then all their aerial parts were cut, washed twice in double-distilled water, and their mineral content was determined. For the wild-type plants, each column represents the average of 4 plates (each plate included 12 seedlings). For the transgenic plants, each column represents the average of 4 plates, of which each 2 plates were of the two transgenic genotypes 2 and 9. These two genotypes had a similar level of MHX expression and similar mineral content. For plants grown in the greenhouse, seeds of homozygous transgenic plants were grown in soil until the plants were 50 cm long. Their lower leaves were cut, washed twice with double-distilled water, and analyzed. Each column represents the average of 2 different plants (of the two different genotypes 2 and 9 for the transgenic plants). Except plants grown in the greenhouse (Greenh.), all the plants were grown in Nitsch medium containing standard levels of Mg²⁺ (0.75 mM Mg₂SO₄), Zn²⁺ (0.035 mM Zn₂SO₄), and Ca²⁺ (1.5 mM CaCl₂) or supplemented with the indicated levels (in mM) of cations. The accompanying anions were either nitrate (N) or sulfate (S).

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The principles and operation of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and accompanying descriptions.

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.

As detailed in the Background section, cellular functions require adequate homeostasis of several divalent metal cations, including Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺. Mg²⁺, the most abundant free divalent cytoplasmic cation, is essential for many enzymatic reactions, while Zn²⁺ is a structural constituent of various enzymes. Multicellular organisms have to balance not only the intake of Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺, but also the distribution of these ions to various organs. To date, genes encoding Mg²⁺ transport proteins have not been cloned from any multicellular organism.

The present invention relates to the cloning and characterization of an Arabidopsis thaliana transporter, designated MHX, which is localized in the vacuolar membrane and functions as an electrogenic exchanger of protons with Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ ions. Functional homologs of MHX have not been cloned from any organism. MHX mRNA is mainly found at the vascular cylinder, and a large proportion of the mRNA is localized in close association with the xylem tracheary elements (not shown). This localization indicates that MHX may control the partitioning of Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ between the various plant organs.

According to the present invention, a complementary DNA (SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 3) and a genomic (SEQ ID NO:4) DNA sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana cv. C-24 encoding a 539-amino acid transporter protein designated MHX (SEQ ID NOs: 2 and 3) were isolated and characterized. Hydropathy analyses using the Eisenberg, Schwarz, Komarony and Wall method revealed 11 putative and conserved transmembrane domains marked bold and underlined in FIG. 4, rendering MHX a member of the 11-12 transmembrane-domain transporter family.

Biochemical and physiological studies revealed that MHX is a vacuolar membrane protein and that it is a magnesium-proton (Mg²⁺/H⁺) exchanger which employs proton (H⁺) gradient to transport magnesium ions (Mg²⁺) or zinc ions (Zn²⁺) or other divalent ions, such as ferrum ions (Fe²⁺), but not calcium ions (Ca²⁺), against their electrochemical gradient.

The 2803 bp MHX genomic clone was here isolated for the first time according to the present invention. Its sequence is comprised within locus ATAC002535 (GenBank). The suggested translation of the published genomic sequence derived from locus ATAC002535, designated PID:g2529667 (SEQ ID NO:5), includes, as shown in FIG. 4, only 474 amino acids. Compared to the MHX of the present invention, the known sequence lacks the N-terminal 66 amino acids including the initiator methionine and the first transmembrane domain of MHX. Furthermore, it includes a stretch of seven successive non-identical amino acids (marked bold in FIG. 4) of which five successive amino acids are also not conserved within the MHX sequence. This domain in the MHX gene is predicted to be between transmembrane domains 5 and 6 (FIG. 4). Due to its homology to known Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchangers, it was suggested that the PID:g2529667 protein is a putative Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchanger. Since it lacks the terminal 66 amino acids including the first transmembrane domain, it is clear that the PID:g2529667 protein is not functional because it cannot be properly assembled.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section below, the term “divalent cation-proton exchange activity” refers to the ability to employ proton (H⁺) gradient to transport divalent cations, such as magnesium ions (Mg²⁺) and other divalent ions, such as zinc ions (Zn²⁺) and ferrum ions (Fe²⁺), against their electrochemical gradient.

According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided an expression vector comprising a chimeric DNA molecule of the invention, expressible from the expression vector. Any suitable expression vector for plant transformation can be used according to th invention. In a preferred embodiment, the chimeric gene is cloned into an Agrobacterium binary vector.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section below, the terms “expressing”, “expression” and “expressible” refers to the processes executed by cells while producing proteins, including where applicable, but not limited to, for example, transcription, translation, folding and post-translational modification, processing and transport.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section below, the term “transformed” refers to the result of a process of inserting nucleic acids into plant cells. The insertion may, for example, be effected by transformation, viral infection, injection, transfection, gene bombardment, electroporation or any other means effective in introducing nucleic acids into plant cells. Following transformation, the nucleic acid is integrated entirely or partially either into the cell's genome (DNA) or remains external to the cell's genome, thereby providing stably transformed or transiently transformed cells.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section below, the phrase “transformed cell” refers to a cell that includes one or more copies of a recombinant gene.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section below, the term “transgenic plant” refers to a plant comprised at least partially of transformed cells. It includes also plants resulting, for example, from grafting between a transformed and a nontransformed plant, whereby parts of the resulting plant will be comprised of transformed cells and other parts of nontransformed cells.

Listed hereinunder are some considerations which may be useful in implementing some or all of the above aspects of the present invention.

Optimal uptake and distribution of ions in different soil conditions may be dependent on several different factors such as: (i) level of proton/cation exchange activity; (ii) membrane localization of the exchanger; (iii) expression of the exchanger by special cells; and (iv) modification of the exchanger to improve its transport activity.

The level of the exchanger and hence the level of proton/cation exchange may be altered by using different promoters as well as by using various controlling DNA elements that modulate transcription, post-transcription and translation.

The expression of the DNA molecules employed according to the present invention in plants is carried out under the control of a suitable plant promoter. Promoters which are known or found to cause transcription of selected gene or genes in plant cells can be used according to the invention. The particular promoter selected should be capable of causing sufficient expression to result in the production of an effective amount of the desired protein. Such promoters may be obtained from plants or plant pathogens such as bacteria or viruses.

The promoter can be a constitutive promoter which is active in all or most plant tissues, a tissue- or organ-specific promoter which is active mostly in specific tissue(s) or organ(s), an inducible promoter which is induced under stress conditions, and a chimeric promoter. The phrase “tissue specific promoter” refers also to a developmental stage specific promoter.

There is a plurality of constitutive promoters known to express in plant tissues. Examples of constitutive promoters that can be used according to the invention include, but are not necessarily limited to, the 35S and 19S promoters of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV35S and CaMV19S) [Guilley et al., 1982]; the full-length transcript promoter from the figwort mosaic virus (FMV34S) [U.S. Pat. No. 5,512,466] the promoter of cassava vein mosaic virus (CsVMV) [Verdaguer et al., 1996]; the sugarcane bacilliform badnavirus promoter that is active both in monocots and in dicots [Tzafrir et al., 1998]; promoters isolated from plant genes such as Arabidopsis ACT2/ACT8 actin promoter [An et al., 1996]; Arabidopsis ubiquitin UBQ1 promoter, rice actin promoter [McElroy et al., 1990]and barley leaf thionin BTH6 promoter [Holtorf et al., 1995], and promoters obtained from T-DNA genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens such as nopaline and mannopine synthases.

Particularly useful promoters for use in the present invention are tissue- or organ-specific specific promoters such as root, stem, leaf, flower, fruit or seed specific promoters. Examples of fruit or seed specific promoters include the E8, E4, E17 and J49 promoters from tomato [Lincoln and Fischer 1988], as well as the 2A11 promoter described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,943,674. An example of a flower-specific promoter is described in Helariutta et al., 1993.

Examples of root-specific promoters are the promoters of the hemoglobin genes from Parasponia andersonii (Bogusz et al., 1990), the promoter of the peroxidase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana (Wanapu and Shinmyo, 1996). An example of a root-specific, salinity and dehydration stress inducible promoter, is the promoter of the ARSK1 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana (Hwang and Goodman, 1990).

Stress inducible promoters can also be employed in the present invention including, but not limited to, the light inducible promoter derived from the pea rbcS gene [Coruzzi et al., 1984]; the promoter from the alfalfa rbcS gene [Khoudi et al., 1997]; promoters active in drought, such as DRE promoter or MYC, MYB promoters [Liu et al., 1998; Abe et al., 1997]; a promoter active in high salinity, such as INT, INPS or prxEa [Nelson et al., 1998; Wanapu et al., 1996]; a promoter active under osmotic shock, such as Ha hsp 17.7G4 or RD21 promoters [Coca et al., 1996; Koizumi et al., 1993]; and a promoter active in cases of pathogenicity, such as hsr303J or str246C [Pontier et al., 1998; Perez et al., 1997].

The constitutive, tissue-specific, organ-specific and inducible promoters used for expressing the recombinant protein of this invention may be further modified, if desired, to alter expression characteristics, thus generating chimeric promoters. For example, the CaMV35S promoter may be ligated to a portion of the ssRUBISCO gene which represses the expression of ssRUBISCO in the absence of light, to create a chimeric promoter which is active in leaves but not in roots. As used herein, the terms “CaMV35S”, “FMV35S” or to this effect any other promoter include genetic variations of these promoters, e.g., chimeric promoters derived by means of ligation with operator regions, random or controlled mutagenesis, addition or duplication of enhancer sequences, and the like.

For example, for high level constitutive expression, the CaMV35S promoter can be used, while for root or stem specific expression, root- or stem-specific promoters may be used, respectively. Alteration of the level of expression of the exchanger may also be achieved by screening different transgenic genotypes in which the transgene has been inserted into different positions in the genome (position effect). Variable 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions may be used to control the translation efficiency.

Transport of proteins to various cellular membranes, such as the vacuolar membrane, the plasma membrane, the ER membrane, the mitochondrial membrane, or the chloroplast membrane, is known to occur by special signals present on the transported protein. Thus, modifying or introducing such signals on the MHX polypeptide may enable to localize it on each of the above mentioned membranes. When the exchanger is directed to the plasma membrane, two different functions may be achieved upon expression in different cell types. Expression in the root epidermal or cortex cells, using epidermal or cortex specific promoters, will result in decreased uptake of divalent metals due to transporter-induced export of these metals (using the acidic pH of the apoplasm) outside the cells. Such an approach may prevent uptake of toxic ions. Specific expression of the exchanger in the xylem parenchyma cells (using for instance its own promoter) is expected to increase the loading of divalent ions into the xylem, using the acidic pH of the xylem vessels. This may improve uptake of important metals under conditions of their limitations in the soil.

Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions, illustrate the invention in a non limiting fashion.

EXAMPLES Example 1

Cloning Arabidopsis MHX complementary and genomic DNA sequences: The MHX complementary DNA sequence was cloned by serendipity while attempting to clone a plant homolog for the Swi4 yeast transcription factor.

A first strand cDNA was prepared from poly(A)⁺ mRNA purified from Arabidopsis thaliana cv. C-24 essentially as described in the protocol provided with the 5′ RACE System (catalog No. 8374SA, Gibco BRL).

The resultant single stranded cDNAs pool was employed in a PCR reaction with the following degenerated primers originally designed to clone a plant homolog of the Swi4 yeast transcription factor: Primer 3: 5′-CA(C/T)GA(G/A)AA(G/A)GTICA(G/A)GGIGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:6) and Primer 4: 5′-GCCCA(G/A)TGIA (G/A)IGCIGT(G/A)TG-3′. (SEQ ID NO:7).

Throughout this work PCR mixtures included 1 μl template DNA (no specific emphasis on DNA concentration); 2 μl reaction buffer for Vent Polymerase (Supplied by New England Biolabs, Inc.); 1 μl (0.2 μg) 5′-primer; 1 μl (0.2 μg) 3′-primer; 0.4 μl of 10 mM dNTP; 0.2 μl of Vent DNA Polymerase (0.4 units, New England Biolabs, Inc.) and 14.4 μl H₂O.

Throughout this work PCR cycling conditions were: for the first two cycles—2 min, 94° C., 2 min, 50° C., 3 min, 72° C.; for the next 38 cycles—0.5 min, 94° C., 0.5 min, 52° C., 3 min, 72° C.; final extension—10 min, 72° C.

The resulting PCR product of about 730 bp was purified from an agarose gel and ligated into a pGEM-5Zf(+) vector (Promega) that was first bluntly linearized with EcoRV.

Throughout this work, the molecular biology procedures employed were according to standard protocols (e.g., Sambrook et al., 1989), with enzymes from New England Biolabs, Inc., and if required, following the manufacturer's instructions.

The resulting cDNA clone was sequenced. Sequence determinations were performed with vector specific and gene specific primers, using an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, model 373A). Each nucleotide was read from at least two independent primers. The cDNA clone, 735 bp long, included an open reading frame that showed low homology to animal Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchangers.

To clone the 5′ and 3′ regions, the 5′ and 3′ RACE system of Clontech and Gibco BRL (Life Technologies Inc.) was employed, according to the instruction manual provided therewith.

In a first set of reactions the first strand cDNA pool described above or Arabidopsis thaliana cv. C-24 total genomic DNA (prepared from Arabidopsis thaliana cv. C-24 according to Sambrook et al., 1989) were used independently as templates for PCR reactions with primers 17 and 18 which were selected according to the terminal ends of the 5′ and 3′ RACE products. Primer 17: 5′-GGGGGAACGCTTGACCGATTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:8); Primer 18: 5′-CCGGGCCTCCAAAATCATAGT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:9).

In a second set of reactions 1 μl of each of the first reactions was used independently as templates, for PCR reactions with nested primers 19 and 20. Primer 19: 5′-CCCGTGATCGGCGTATTGTGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:10); Primer 20: 5′-GCCAACTGCCTTTGAACTTTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 11).

In a third reaction 1 μl of the second reaction of the genomic DNA was used as template, for PCR reaction with internally nested primers 36 and 37. Primer 36: 5′-ATGCCGCTCACCGAGATATT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:12); Primer 37: 5′-TCTTCTACTCATGGGGTTTTTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 13).

The PCR product including the fill length cDNA (SEQ ID NO:1) was obtained after the second reaction (in between primers 19 and 20). This PCR product was purified from an agarose gel and ligated into the pGEM-5Zf(+) vector (Promega) that was bluntly linearized with EcoRV, to obtain plasmid p218.

The PCR product containing the genomic DNA (SEQ ID NO:4) was obtained after the third reaction (in between primers 36 and 37). This PCR product was purified from agarose gels and ligated it into the pGEM-5Zf(+) vector (Promega) that was bluntly linearized with EcoRV, to obtain plasmid p253.

Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of the isolate with proteins from the data bank have shown that the isolate exhibits low sequence homology (36.33 % identity) to animal Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchangers NCX1 (Nicoll et al., 1990). Hydropathy analyses predicted that the new protein would be an integral membrane protein featuring 11 transmembrane domains (see FIG. 4).

Example 2

Construction of plasmids for MHX expression in plants and plant transformations: Plasmid p218 was used as a template for a PCR reaction using primers 42 and 35.

Primer 42: 5′-GGGGTTTGAATAAGTTACCATGGCCTCAATTCTTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:14) introduced an NcoI site at the first ATG codon of the MHX cDNA;

Primer 35: 5′-TCTTCTATATGACGCCTGA AACT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:15).

The PCR product was isolated from an agarose gel and was ligated into a pGEM-5Zf(+) vector (Promega) that was bluntly linearized with EcoRV, to yield a plasmid designated p370. The cloning orientation was such that the 5′ region of the coding sequence of MHX was close to the T7 promoter region of pGEM-5Zf(+).

Due to the presence of the CaMV35S promoter in the pGEM-5Zf(+) vector which can direct some expression also in bacteria and possibly exert deleterious effect thereupon that can result in selection of mutants, a part of the genomic sequence of MHX including the second intron thereof was introduced into plasmid p370, such that the open reading frame in bacteria was destroyed (see FIG. 5).

To this end, a ClaI—xhoI fragment was excised out of plasmid p370, and replaced with a 300 bp ClaI—XhoI fragment of plasmid p253 which included the second intron of MHX, to yield plasmid p20.

Plasmid pJD330 (5.2 Kb, a kind gift from Dr. D. R. Gallie, Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, USA) includes the strong constitutive CaMV35S promoter, the Q sequence, the coding region of the glucuronidase (gus) gene, and the nopaline synthase (nos) transcription termination and polyadenylation signal (3′).

A NcoI-HincII fragment of plasmid p20, including the entire MHX coding sequence, was isolated and inserted in between NcoI and SmaI sites of pJD330 (replacing the gus coding sequence), to create plasmid p21.

Plasmid p21 was cut with XbaI, and the resulting fragments were blunt-ended using Kienow reaction. The fragment that included the coding sequence of MHX, the CaMV35S promoter, the Ω enhancer of translation at its 5′ end, and the nos transcription termination and polyadenylation signal at its 3′ end, was cloned into a SmaI site of the Agrobacterium binary vector pGSV4 (Shaul et al., 1996), to yield plasmid p22 (FIG. 5).

Example 3

Intracellular localization of MHX in wild-type and transgenic plants: Anti-MHX polyclonal antibodies were raised in rabbits by standard protocols against two synthetic peptides derived from the MHX sequence, designated peptides A and D. The peptides were linked each through its initial Cys residue to the high-molecular weight KLH carrier (Calbiochem) and injected into rabbits. The antibodies were affinity-purified against the same peptides using the SulfoLink Coupling Gel (Pierce) according to manufacturer's instructions.

Peptide A: Cys Glu Glu Ile Asp Thr Ser Lys Asp Asp Asn Asp Asn Asp Val His Asp (SEQ ID NO:16); and Peptide D: Cys Met Ser Arg Gly Asp Arg Pro Glu Glu Trp Val Pro Glu Glu Ile (SEQ ID NO:17). These peptides corresponded to two regions of predicted non-membranal domains of the MHX sequence.

To identify the intracellular location of MHX in wild-type plants, Arabidopsis root membranes were extracted, fractionated in sucrose gradients as described before (Schaller and DeWitt, 1995), and subjected to Western-blot analysis with the following antibodies (Ab): MHX-D—affmity-purified Ab against MHX-derived peptide D (SEQ ID NO:17); MHX-A—affmity-purified Ab against MHX-derived peptide A (SEQ ID NO:16); VM—Ab against a vacuolar membrane marker [VM23, a homolog of γ-TIP from radish (Raphanus sativus), which is a species closely related to Arabidopsis (Maeshima, 1992), a kind gift from Prof. Maeshima Masayoshi, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Japan]; PM—Ab against the Arabidopsis plasma membrane marker protein RD-28 (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., 1992), a kind gift of Prof. Chrispeels, M. J. of University of California San Diego; ER—antibodies against the endoplasmic reticulum yeast BiP protein, that specifically recognize plant ER BiP (Shimoni et al., 1995).

As shown in FIG. 6, the two anti-MHXx antibodies A and D recognized a similar band, which co-fractionated with the vacuolar-membrane-marker, and not with either the plasma membrane-marker, or with the ER-marker. These findings indicate that MEX is localized in the vacuole membrane.

To localize the expressed recombinant MHX in transgenic tobacco plants, the experiment was carried out with the following antibodies (Ab): MHX—affinity-purified Ab againt peptide D; VM—monoclonal Ab against the vacuolar membrane marker H⁺-ATPase (Ward et al., 1992), a kind gift of Dr. Sze Heven, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA; PM—Ab against the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase, a kind gift of Dr. Serrano R., University Politecnica de Valencia, Spain; ER—as above.

As shown in FIG. 7, the recombinant MHX protein co-fractionated in sucrose gradients with the vacuolar membrane marker, indicating that most of it was localized in the vacuolar membranes.

Example 4

Expression of MHX in tobacco plants and in tobbaco cell suspension cultures: Plasmid p22 described in Example 2 above was used to transform tobacco cell suspension cultures and tobacco plants, using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods. Thus, plasmid p22 was first immobilized into Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58C1 (pMP90) (Shaul et al., 1996), using the three-parental-mating procedure (Ditta et al., 1980), and the transformed Agrobacterium was used to transform the tobacco BY-2 cell line (Nagata et al., 1992), kindly provided by the Tobacco Science Research Laboratory, Japan Tobacco Inc., as described before (Shaul et al., 1996) and to transform Nicotiana tabaccum cv Samsun NN by the leaf-disk approach as previously described (Horsch et al., 1985).

The transgenic suspension cultures and plants produced a protein with the expected molecular weight of about 53 kD, which crossreacted with the anti-MHX antibodies A and D. Such a protein band was not detected in control, non-transformed cells (FIG. 8).

Example 5

Activity of recombinant MHX: The activity of recombinant MHX was examined in two independently transformed tobacco BY-2 cell lines using the giant-patch clamp technique, as described before (Hilgemann, 1995).

Vacuoles of MHX-transformed cells exhibited a Mg²⁺/H⁺, Zn²⁺/H⁺ and Fe²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity that was significantly higher than that of vacuoles from control non-transformed cells (FIG. 9). This is the first disclosure of a cloned gene encoding a protein with Mg²⁺/H⁺ or Zn²⁺/H⁺ exchange activity.

Mg²⁺/H⁺-derived currents were not detected in the plasma membrane of the transformed cells (data not shown). The MHX exchanger was not able to exchange protons with Ca²⁺ (FIG. 9). The concentration of ions that were tested were 2 mM for Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ and 0.2 mM for Zn²⁺ and Fe²⁺.

In all aspects studied in the above examples there was no detectable difference between the 2 independently transformed tobacco BY-2 cell lines.

Example 6

Growth of transgenic plants expressing MHX in the presence of high Mg or Ca levels in the growth medium: Wild-type and MHX-transformed plants were grown on Nitsch medium including 10 mM Mg(NO₃)₂, 30 mM Mg(NO₃)₂ or 30 mM Ca(NO₃)₂. As shown in FIG. 10, the growth of both wild-type and transgenic plants was not inhibited in the presence of high Mg levels. In contrast, the growth of both wild-type and transgenic plants was inhibited in the presence of 30 mM Ca(NO₃)₂ as compared to plants grown on Nitsch medium containing 1.5 mM Ca²⁺, but the transgenic plants were significantly less inhibited. This indicates the potential of MHX production in transgenic plants to overcome the problem of growing plants in the presence of high levels of Ca in the medium or soil.

Example 7

Effect of MHX expression in accumulation of cations in plants: To test whether MHX expression affects the accumulation of cations in the MHX-transformed plants, we measured the amounts of various cations in shoots of transforrned and non-transformed plants grown with normal as well as in elevated Mg²⁺, Zn²⁺ or Ca²⁺ levels.

For the mineral content analysis, the plant material was dried 48 hours in a 70° C. oven, and then crushed into a fine powder. For each sample, 120-250 mg dry powder were weighed into 50 ml polypropylene disposable test tubes, and 5 ml of concentrated nitric acid were added. Ten samples were processed at a time. The tubes were left unsealed for 10 min and then were fitted with a screw cap that was left untightened. The tubes, in a plastic stand, were transferred to a temperature controlled microwave oven (an MLS 1200 mega microwave digestion unit, Milestone Sorisole (BG) Italy). The samples were subjected to three digestion cycles of 20 min each, at 450 W of microwave power and 95° C. The vessels were allowed to cool for 10 min between cycles, and were finally brought to room temperature and were uncapped. The volume was made up to 25 ml with deionized water. Analyses were conducted on portions of these solutions. Na⁺ and Ca²⁺content were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. An ICP-AES, model “Spectroflame” from Spectro, Kleve, Germany was used.

As shown in FIG. 11, the amounts of magnesium, zinc or calcium increased in shoots of plants grown in media containing elevated levels of these minerals. However, no difference was observed in the total content of these cations between shoots of transformed and non-transformed plants. Unexpectedly, we found that the MHX-transgenic plants have significantly less sodium in their shoots compared to wild-type plants. The levels of several other cations and minerals analyzed (potassium, cupric, ferrum, silicon, manganese, barium, strontium, molybdenum, selenium, boron, sulfate, phosphate) were essentially similar in leaves of wansformed and non-transformed plants (FIG. 11 and data not shown).

Salinity stress has many causes and it is generally assumed that it will not be overcome by a single genetic modification (Serrano, 1996). The MHX genetic modification may contribute to salt tolerance. As detailed in the Background section, one of the constraints exerted by salinity stress is sodium toxicity, brought about by high levels of sodium in the shoots; accordingly, many salt-tolerant species developed mechanisms for restricting sodium transport to the shoots (Marschner, 1995, pp. 84-85). The reduced sodium levels in the shoots of transgenic plants expressing MHX may reduce sodium ion toxicity and thus may increase salt tolerance in the transgenic plants. There is no direct explanation how MHX expression reduces sodium content in the leaves. Although MHX has been characterized by our electrophysiological analyses as an exchanger of protons with Mg²⁺, Zn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ ions, we cannot exclude the possibility that under some conditions Na⁺ ions are able to compete with either the protons or the divalent cations.

Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.

REFERENCES

1. Abe, H. et al.,(1997) Plant Cell, 9: 1859-68.

2. Amalou, Z., Gibrat, R, Brugidou, C., Trouslot, P. and d'Auzac, J. (1992) Evidence for an amiloride-inhibited Mg²⁺/2H⁺ antiporter in lutoid (vacuolar) vesicles from latex of Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol., 100: 25 255-260.

3. Amalou, Z., Gibrat, R., Trouslot, P. and d'Auzac, J. (1994) Solubilization and reconstitution of the Mg²⁺/2H⁺ antiporter of the lutoid tonoplast from Hevea brasiliensis latex. Plant Physiol., 106: 79-85.

4. An, Y. Q. et al., (1996) Plant J., 10: 107-21.

5. Bogusz, D. et al., (1990) Plant Cell, 2: 633-641.

6. Coca, M. A. et al., (1996) Plant Mol Biol., 31: 863-76.

7. Conruzzi, G. et al., (1984) EMBO J., 3: 1671-1679.

8. Ditta, G., Stanfield, D., Corbin, D. and Helinski, D., R. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 7347.

9. Eisenberg, D., Schwarz, E., Komaromy, M. and Wall, R. (1984) Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot J. Mol. Biol., 179: 125-142.

10. Gallie, D. R., Sleat, D. E., Watts, J. W., Turner, P. C. and Wilson, T. M. (1987) The 5′-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nuc. Acid Res., 15: 3257-3273.

11. Guilley, H. (1982) Transcription of Cauliflower mosaic virus DNA: detection of promoter sequences, and characterization of transcripts. Cell, 30: 763-773.

12. Gunshin H., Mackenzie, B., Berger, U. V., Gunshin, Y., Romero, M. F., Boron, W. F., Nussberger, S., Gollan J. L. and Hediger, M. A. (1997) Cloning and characterization of a mammalian proton-coupled metal-ion transporter. Nature, 388: 482-488.

13. Helariutta, Y. et al., (1993) Cloning of cDNA for dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) and characterization of dfr expression in the corollas of Gerbera hybrida var. Regina (Compositae). Plant Mol. Biol., 22: 183-193.

14. Hilgemann, D. W. (1995) The Giant Membrane Patch. In Sakmann, B. and Neher, E. (eds.), Single-Channel Recording. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 307-327.

15. Hmiel, S. P., Snavely, M. D., Florer, J. B., Maguire, M. E. and Miller, C. G. (1989) Magnesium transport in Salmonella typhimurium: genetic characterization and cloning of three magnesium transport loci. J. Bacteriol., 171: 4742-4751.

16. Holtorf, S. et al., (1995) Plant Mol Biol., 29:637-46;

17. Horsch, R. B., Fry, J. E., Hoffmann, N. L., Eichholtz, D., Rogers, S. G. and Fraley, R. T. (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science, 227: 1229-1231.

18. Hwang, I. and Goodman, H. M. (1995) An Arabidopsis thaliana root-specific kinase homolog is induced by dehydration, ABA, and NaCl. Plant J., 8: 3743.

19. Khoudi et al., (1997) Gene, 197: 343-351.

20. Koizumi, M. et al., (1993) Gene, 129: 175-82.

21 . Lincoln, J. and Fischer, R. (1988) Diverse mechanisms for the regulation of ethylene-inducible gene expression. Mol Gen Genet., 212: 71-75.

22. Liu, X. and Gorovsky, M. A. (1993) Mapping the 5′ and 3′ ends of Tetrahymena thermophila mRNAs using RNA ligase mediated amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE). Nuc. Acids. Res., 21: 4954-4960.

23. Liu, Q. et al., (1998) Plant Cell, 10: 1391-406.

24. Maeshirna, M. (1992) Characterization of the major integral protein of vacuolar membrane. Plant Physiol., 98: 1248-1254.

25. Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London.

26. McElroy, D. et al., (1990) The Plant Cell, 2: 163-171.

27. Nagata, T., Nemoto, Y. and Hasezawa, S. (1992) Tobacco BY-2 cell line as the “HeLa” cell in the cell biology of higher plants. Int. Rev. Cytol., 132: 1-30.

28. Nelson, D. E. et al., (1998) Plant Cell, 10: 753-64.

29. Nicoll, D. A., Longoni, S. and Philipson. K. D. (1990) Molecular cloning and functional expression of the cardiac sarcolemmal Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchanger Science, 250: 562-565.

30. Nitsch, J. P. (1969) Experimental androgenesis in Nicotiana. Phytomorph., 19: 389-404.

31. Oertli, J. J. (1968) Extracellular salt accumulation, a possible mechanism of salt injury in plants. Agrochimica, 12: 461469.

32. Perez, V. et al., (1997) Mol Plant Microbe interact. 10: 750-60.

33. Pfeiffer, W. and Hager, A. (1993) A Ca²⁺-ATPase and a Mg²⁺/H⁺-antiporter are present on tonoplast membranes from roots of Zea mays L. Planta, 191: 377-385.

34. Pontier, D. et al., (1998) Mol Plant Microbe interact. 11: 544-54.

35. Rensing, C., Mitra, B. and Rosen, B. P. (1997) The znta gene of Escherichia coli encodes a Zn(II)-translocating P-type ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 14326-14331.

36. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular cloning—a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

37. Schaller, G. E. and DeWitt, N. D. (1995) Analysis of the H⁺-ATPase and other proteins of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane. Methods Cell Biol., 50: 129-148.

38. Serrano, R. (1996) Salt tolerance in plants and microorganisms: toxicity targets and defense responses. Int. Rev. Cyt., 165: 1-52.

39. Shaul, O., Mironov, V., Burssens, S., Van Montagu, M. and Inzé, D. (1996) Two Arabidopsis cyclin promoters mediate distinctive transcriptional oscillation in synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 93: 4868-4872.

40. Shimoni, Y., Zhu, X., Levanony, H., Segal, G. and Galili, G. (1995) Purification, characterization, and intracellular localization of glycosylated protein disulfide isomerase from wheat grains. Plant Physiol., 108: 327-335.

41. Smith, R. L., Banks, J. L., Marshall, D. S. and Maguire, M. E. (1993) Sequence and topology of the CorA magnesium transport systems of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Identification of a new class of transport proteins. J. Biol. Chem., 268: 14071-14080.

42. Smith, R. L., Mompson, L. J. and Maguire, M. E. (1995) Cloning and characterization of mgtE, a putative new class of Mg²⁺ transporter from Bacillus firmus OF4. J. Bacteriol., 177: 1233-1238.

43. Tzafrir, I. et al., (1998) Plant Mol Biol., 38: 347-56.

44. Verdaguer, B. et al., (1996) Plant Mol Biol., 31: 1129-39.

45. Wanapu, C. and Shinmyo, A. (1996) cis-regulatory elements of the peroxidase gene in Arabidopsis thaliana involved in root-specific expression and responsiveness to high-salt stress. Ann NY Acad Sci. 782: 107-14.

46. Ward, J. A., Reinders, H. H. and Sze, H. (1992) Dissociation and reassembly of the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase complex from oat roots. Plant Physiol. 99: 161-169.

47. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Masahiro, K., Satomi, U. and Kazuo, S. (1992) Molecular cloning and characterization of 9 cDNAs for genes that are responsive for desiccation in Arabidopsis thaliana: sequence analysis of one cDNA clone that encodes a putative transmembrane channel protein. Plant Cell Physiol., 33: 217-224.

48. Zhao, H. and Eide, D. (1996a) The yeast ZRT1 gene encodes the zinc transporter protein of a high-affinity uptake system induced by zinc limitation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 2454-2458.

49. Zhao, H. and Eide, D. (1996b) The ZRT2 gene encodes the low affinity zinc transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 23203-23210.

17 1 1950 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana 1 tcgatttccg tttgtcggaa aatctctccc gtgatcggcg tattgtgaat gccgctcacc 60 gagatattct ccgattcttt tccccagtga ggacaagtgt tcagttgact tattaggagg 120 tggggtttga ataagttaca atggcctcaa ttcttaatca aacccaggag ttgcaagaat 180 cttctaaggt tcttgggcat ttaagatgtg aaaacttctt tctattcccc ggagaaaaca 240 ctttgtcaga tggtttgagg ggtgtgttat attttctcgg tcttgcctac tgctttattg 300 ggttgtcagc catcactgca cggttcttca agtctatgga gaatgtcgtg aaacattccc 360 gtaaagtggt tacaattgat cccattacta aagctgaagt catcacatac aagaaagttt 420 ggaactttac tattgcagac atcagtttgt tggcgtttgg aactagcttc cctcagattt 480 ctttggctac catcgatgca atacggaata tgggggagcg gtatgctgga ggtcttggtc 540 ctggaacact tgttggctca gctgcatttg atcttttccc catccacgct gtttgtgtcg 600 ttgtgccaaa agctggagaa ctgaaaaaga tatccgactt aggtgtttgg ctagttgagc 660 tcgtatggtc tttttgggct tacatctggc tatacataat cctcgaggtg tggtcaccaa 720 acgtaattac acttgtggag gcattattga cagtactgca atacggattg cttctagttc 780 atgcgtacgc ccaagacaag cgatggcctt acttgtcttt accaatgtca agaggtgata 840 ggccagagga gtgggttcca gaggagattg atacatccaa agatgacaat gacaatgatg 900 ttcatgatgt gtattcggat gctgctcaag atgctgttga atcgggaagc agaaacattg 960 ttgatatctt ctctattcat tcagctaaca atgatacagg gatcacttat catactgtgg 1020 cagatactcc acccgattct gcgactaaga agggtaaggc gaagaattct actgtttttg 1080 acatttggaa acatcaattc gtggatgcaa taacgttgga aacatcagaa tcaaagaaag 1140 tggatagcat ttatcttcga atcgcgaaat ctttctggca tttactcctc gccccttgga 1200 aactgctttt tgcatttgtg cccccctgca acattgctca cggttggatc gctttcatct 1260 gctctctcct cttcatcagt ggagtagcct ttgttgtcac aagatttact gaccttataa 1320 gctgtgtcac tggaataaac ccatatgtga tagcattcac agcactcgca agtggaactt 1380 catggccaga cttagtagca agtaaaatcg ctgcagagcg acaactaacc gcagattcag 1440 ctattgcaaa catcacctgc agtaactcgg tgaacatcta tgtggggatt ggagttccgt 1500 ggctgataaa cacagtctac aactactttg catacagaga gcctttatac atagaaaacg 1560 ctaaaggatt aagcttttcg cttctgatat tctttgcgac atcagtggga tgtatcgtgg 1620 tgcttgtgtt gagaaggttg attataggag ctgagcttgg aggtccaagg ctatgggctt 1680 ggcttacttc tgcctatttc atgatgcttt gggtcgtctt cgttgttctt tcttctttga 1740 aagtttcagg cgtcatatag aagaagcaac aaaaggaaaa accccatgag tagaagaaaa 1800 agtcttagct tacttgcaca tgtctcagtt tttgtttttc ttacttgtta agggggtttt 1860 atataattat caaagttcaa aggcagttgg ctaaatatgt gttgcaaata taaatcatat 1920 tgactatgat tttggaggct taaaaaaaaa 1950 2 539 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana 2 Met Ala Ser Ile Leu Asn Gln Thr Gln Glu Leu Gln Glu Ser Ser Lys 1 5 10 15 Val Leu Gly His Leu Arg Cys Glu Asn Phe Phe Leu Phe Pro Gly Glu 20 25 30 Asn Thr Leu Ser Asp Gly Leu Arg Gly Val Leu Tyr Phe Leu Gly Leu 35 40 45 Ala Tyr Cys Phe Ile Gly Leu Ser Ala Ile Thr Ala Arg Phe Phe Lys 50 55 60 Ser Met Glu Asn Val Val Lys His Ser Arg Lys Val Val Thr Ile Asp 65 70 75 80 Pro Ile Thr Lys Ala Glu Val Ile Thr Tyr Lys Lys Val Trp Asn Phe 85 90 95 Thr Ile Ala Asp Ile Ser Leu Leu Ala Phe Gly Thr Ser Phe Pro Gln 100 105 110 Ile Ser Leu Ala Thr Ile Asp Ala Ile Arg Asn Met Gly Glu Arg Tyr 115 120 125 Ala Gly Gly Leu Gly Pro Gly Thr Leu Val Gly Ser Ala Ala Phe Asp 130 135 140 Leu Phe Pro Ile His Ala Val Cys Val Val Val Pro Lys Ala Gly Glu 145 150 155 160 Leu Lys Lys Ile Ser Asp Leu Gly Val Trp Leu Val Glu Leu Val Trp 165 170 175 Ser Phe Trp Ala Tyr Ile Trp Leu Tyr Ile Ile Leu Glu Val Trp Ser 180 185 190 Pro Asn Val Ile Thr Leu Val Glu Ala Leu Leu Thr Val Leu Gln Tyr 195 200 205 Gly Leu Leu Leu Val His Ala Tyr Ala Gln Asp Lys Arg Trp Pro Tyr 210 215 220 Leu Ser Leu Pro Met Ser Arg Gly Asp Arg Pro Glu Glu Trp Val Pro 225 230 235 240 Glu Glu Ile Asp Thr Ser Lys Asp Asp Asn Asp Asn Asp Val His Asp 245 250 255 Val Tyr Ser Asp Ala Ala Gln Asp Ala Val Glu Ser Gly Ser Arg Asn 260 265 270 Ile Val Asp Ile Phe Ser Ile His Ser Ala Asn Asn Asp Thr Gly Ile 275 280 285 Thr Tyr His Thr Val Ala Asp Thr Pro Pro Asp Ser Ala Thr Lys Lys 290 295 300 Gly Lys Ala Lys Asn Ser Thr Val Phe Asp Ile Trp Lys His Gln Phe 305 310 315 320 Val Asp Ala Ile Thr Leu Glu Thr Ser Glu Ser Lys Lys Val Asp Ser 325 330 335 Ile Tyr Leu Arg Ile Ala Lys Ser Phe Trp His Leu Leu Leu Ala Pro 340 345 350 Trp Lys Leu Leu Phe Ala Phe Val Pro Pro Cys Asn Ile Ala His Gly 355 360 365 Trp Ile Ala Phe Ile Cys Ser Leu Leu Phe Ile Ser Gly Val Ala Phe 370 375 380 Val Val Thr Arg Phe Thr Asp Leu Ile Ser Cys Val Thr Gly Ile Asn 385 390 395 400 Pro Tyr Val Ile Ala Phe Thr Ala Leu Ala Ser Gly Thr Ser Trp Pro 405 410 415 Asp Leu Val Ala Ser Lys Ile Ala Ala Glu Arg Gln Leu Thr Ala Asp 420 425 430 Ser Ala Ile Ala Asn Ile Thr Cys Ser Asn Ser Val Asn Ile Tyr Val 435 440 445 Gly Ile Gly Val Pro Trp Leu Ile Asn Thr Val Tyr Asn Tyr Phe Ala 450 455 460 Tyr Arg Glu Pro Leu Tyr Ile Glu Asn Ala Lys Gly Leu Ser Phe Ser 465 470 475 480 Leu Leu Ile Phe Phe Ala Thr Ser Val Gly Cys Ile Val Val Leu Val 485 490 495 Leu Arg Arg Leu Ile Ile Gly Ala Glu Leu Gly Gly Pro Arg Leu Trp 500 505 510 Ala Trp Leu Thr Ser Ala Tyr Phe Met Met Leu Trp Val Val Phe Val 515 520 525 Val Leu Ser Ser Leu Lys Val Ser Gly Val Ile 530 535 3 1935 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana CDS (136)..(1755) 3 ttccgtttgt cggaaaatct ctcccgtgat cggcgtattg tgaatgccgc tcaccgagat 60 attctccgat tcttttcccc agtgaggaca agtgttcagt tgacttatta ggaggtgggg 120 tttgaataag ttaca atg gcc tca att ctt aat caa acc cag gag ttg caa 171 Met Ala Ser Ile Leu Asn Gln Thr Gln Glu Leu Gln 1 5 10 gaa tct tct aag gtt ctt ggg cat tta aga tgt gaa aac ttc ttt cta 219 Glu Ser Ser Lys Val Leu Gly His Leu Arg Cys Glu Asn Phe Phe Leu 15 20 25 ttc ccc gga gaa aac act ttg tca gat ggt ttg agg ggt gtg tta tat 267 Phe Pro Gly Glu Asn Thr Leu Ser Asp Gly Leu Arg Gly Val Leu Tyr 30 35 40 ttt ctc ggt ctt gcc tac tgc ttt att ggg ttg tca gcc atc act gca 315 Phe Leu Gly Leu Ala Tyr Cys Phe Ile Gly Leu Ser Ala Ile Thr Ala 45 50 55 60 cgg ttc ttc aag tct atg gag aat gtc gtg aaa cat tcc cgt aaa gtg 363 Arg Phe Phe Lys Ser Met Glu Asn Val Val Lys His Ser Arg Lys Val 65 70 75 gtt aca att gat ccc att act aaa gct gaa gtc atc aca tac aag aaa 411 Val Thr Ile Asp Pro Ile Thr Lys Ala Glu Val Ile Thr Tyr Lys Lys 80 85 90 gtt tgg aac ttt act att gca gac atc agt ttg ttg gcg ttt gga act 459 Val Trp Asn Phe Thr Ile Ala Asp Ile Ser Leu Leu Ala Phe Gly Thr 95 100 105 agc ttc cct cag att tct ttg gct acc atc gat gca ata cgg aat atg 507 Ser Phe Pro Gln Ile Ser Leu Ala Thr Ile Asp Ala Ile Arg Asn Met 110 115 120 ggg gag cgg tat gct gga ggt ctt ggt cct gga aca ctt gtt ggc tca 555 Gly Glu Arg Tyr Ala Gly Gly Leu Gly Pro Gly Thr Leu Val Gly Ser 125 130 135 140 gct gca ttt gat ctt ttc ccc atc cac gct gtt tgt gtc gtt gtg cca 603 Ala Ala Phe Asp Leu Phe Pro Ile His Ala Val Cys Val Val Val Pro 145 150 155 aaa gct gga gaa ctg aaa aag ata tcc gac tta ggt gtt tgg cta gtt 651 Lys Ala Gly Glu Leu Lys Lys Ile Ser Asp Leu Gly Val Trp Leu Val 160 165 170 gag ctc gta tgg tct ttt tgg gct tac atc tgg cta tac ata atc ctc 699 Glu Leu Val Trp Ser Phe Trp Ala Tyr Ile Trp Leu Tyr Ile Ile Leu 175 180 185 gag gtg tgg tca cca aac gta att aca ctt gtg gag gca tta ttg aca 747 Glu Val Trp Ser Pro Asn Val Ile Thr Leu Val Glu Ala Leu Leu Thr 190 195 200 gta ctg caa tac gga ttg ctt cta gtt cat gcg tac gcc caa gac aag 795 Val Leu Gln Tyr Gly Leu Leu Leu Val His Ala Tyr Ala Gln Asp Lys 205 210 215 220 cga tgg cct tac ttg tct tta cca atg tca aga ggt gat agg cca gag 843 Arg Trp Pro Tyr Leu Ser Leu Pro Met Ser Arg Gly Asp Arg Pro Glu 225 230 235 gag tgg gtt cca gag gag att gat aca tcc aaa gat gac aat gac aat 891 Glu Trp Val Pro Glu Glu Ile Asp Thr Ser Lys Asp Asp Asn Asp Asn 240 245 250 gat gtt cat gat gtg tat tcg gat gct gct caa gat gct gtt gaa tcg 939 Asp Val His Asp Val Tyr Ser Asp Ala Ala Gln Asp Ala Val Glu Ser 255 260 265 gga agc aga aac att gtt gat atc ttc tct att cat tca gct aac aat 987 Gly Ser Arg Asn Ile Val Asp Ile Phe Ser Ile His Ser Ala Asn Asn 270 275 280 gat aca ggg atc act tat cat act gtg gca gat act cca ccc gat tct 1035 Asp Thr Gly Ile Thr Tyr His Thr Val Ala Asp Thr Pro Pro Asp Ser 285 290 295 300 gcg act aag aag ggt aag gcg aag aat tct act gtt ttt gac att tgg 1083 Ala Thr Lys Lys Gly Lys Ala Lys Asn Ser Thr Val Phe Asp Ile Trp 305 310 315 aaa cat caa ttc gtg gat gca ata acg ttg gaa aca tca gaa tca aag 1131 Lys His Gln Phe Val Asp Ala Ile Thr Leu Glu Thr Ser Glu Ser Lys 320 325 330 aaa gtg gat agc att tat ctt cga atc gcg aaa tct ttc tgg cat tta 1179 Lys Val Asp Ser Ile Tyr Leu Arg Ile Ala Lys Ser Phe Trp His Leu 335 340 345 ctc ctc gcc cct tgg aaa ctg ctt ttt gca ttt gtg ccc ccc tgc aac 1227 Leu Leu Ala Pro Trp Lys Leu Leu Phe Ala Phe Val Pro Pro Cys Asn 350 355 360 att gct cac ggt tgg atc gct ttc atc tgc tct ctc ctc ttc atc agt 1275 Ile Ala His Gly Trp Ile Ala Phe Ile Cys Ser Leu Leu Phe Ile Ser 365 370 375 380 gga gta gcc ttt gtt gtc aca aga ttt act gac ctt ata agc tgt gtc 1323 Gly Val Ala Phe Val Val Thr Arg Phe Thr Asp Leu Ile Ser Cys Val 385 390 395 act gga ata aac cca tat gtg ata gca ttc aca gca ctc gca agt gga 1371 Thr Gly Ile Asn Pro Tyr Val Ile Ala Phe Thr Ala Leu Ala Ser Gly 400 405 410 act tca tgg cca gac tta gta gca agt aaa atc gct gca gag cga caa 1419 Thr Ser Trp Pro Asp Leu Val Ala Ser Lys Ile Ala Ala Glu Arg Gln 415 420 425 cta acc gca gat tca gct att gca aac atc acc tgc agt aac tcg gtg 1467 Leu Thr Ala Asp Ser Ala Ile Ala Asn Ile Thr Cys Ser Asn Ser Val 430 435 440 aac atc tat gtg ggg att gga gtt ccg tgg ctg ata aac aca gtc tac 1515 Asn Ile Tyr Val Gly Ile Gly Val Pro Trp Leu Ile Asn Thr Val Tyr 445 450 455 460 aac tac ttt gca tac aga gag cct tta tac ata gaa aac gct aaa gga 1563 Asn Tyr Phe Ala Tyr Arg Glu Pro Leu Tyr Ile Glu Asn Ala Lys Gly 465 470 475 tta agc ttt tcg ctt ctg ata ttc ttt gcg aca tca gtg gga tgt atc 1611 Leu Ser Phe Ser Leu Leu Ile Phe Phe Ala Thr Ser Val Gly Cys Ile 480 485 490 gtg gtg ctt gtg ttg aga agg ttg att ata gga gct gag ctt gga ggt 1659 Val Val Leu Val Leu Arg Arg Leu Ile Ile Gly Ala Glu Leu Gly Gly 495 500 505 cca agg cta tgg gct tgg ctt act tct gcc tat ttc atg atg ctt tgg 1707 Pro Arg Leu Trp Ala Trp Leu Thr Ser Ala Tyr Phe Met Met Leu Trp 510 515 520 gtc gtc ttc gtt gtt ctt tct tct ttg aaa gtt tca ggc gtc ata tag 1755 Val Val Phe Val Val Leu Ser Ser Leu Lys Val Ser Gly Val Ile 525 530 535 aagaagcaac aaaaggaaaa accccatgag tagaagaaaa agtcttagct tacttgcaca 1815 tgtctcagtt tttgtttttc ttacttgtta agggggtttt atataattat caaagttcaa 1875 aggcagttgg ctaaatatgt gttgcaaata taaatcatat tgactatgat tttggaggct 1935 4 2803 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana 4 ccggtacgtc cgcattgatc aatttcgtcg cgtggctcac tctgtttcat ctgttctttt 60 cttatttttt agctattttt gttgagattt gttcgttgaa aattatggtt ttgtgaaaag 120 aacccaactt gttttactga acccatgatg aaagttataa tcttttgatc tggttacctc 180 tggattttga ttacgcatac agtggaacat gcaattgtta ttagcattgg ttatagattg 240 gatttcggtt acatgccatt ggatccgttg caatgtttag tttgtgttac agattctctg 300 gaaagaaatc tttttgcatg ttccgtttgt ttcgcatcct cttgatactg ttcgatcgat 360 caggctacag gtttcatcag tttcttctaa aagttgtaag cttctttttg gtgtgccaga 420 ttcttttccc cagtgaggac aagtgttcag ttgacttatt aggaggtggg gtttgaataa 480 gttacaatgg cctcaattct taatcaaacc caggagttgc aagaatcttc taaggttctt 540 gggcatttaa gatgtgaaaa cttctttcta ttccccggag aaaacacttt gtcagatggt 600 ttgaggggtg tgttatattt tctcggtctt gcctactgct ttattgggtt gtcagccatc 660 actgcacggt tcttcaagtc tatggagaat gtcgtgaaac attcccgtaa agtggttaca 720 attgatccca ttactaaagc tgaagtcatc acatacaaga aagtttggaa ctttactatt 780 gcagacatca gtttgttggc gtttggaact agcttccctc agatttcttt ggctaccatc 840 gatgcaatac ggaatatggg ggagcggtat gctggaggtc tggtggttgt tcctttcttc 900 cttccaaaac tctagttttt acttttaagt tcatgaattc ttatatcatg ttttgtcata 960 taggtcttgg tcctggaaca cttgttggct cagctgcatt tgatcttttc cccatccacg 1020 ctgtttgtgt cgttgtgcca aaagctggag aactgaaaaa gatatccgac ttaggtgttt 1080 ggctagttga gctcgtatgg tctttttggg cttacatctg gctatacata atcctcgagg 1140 taactgtgaa aagcggttta aacagattct gttgagtcta tactctatac tgataaggtc 1200 taaaaatctg tttcttttca cgtctcacag gtgtggtcac caaacgtaat tacacttgtg 1260 gaggcattat tgacagtact gcaatacgga ttgcttctag ttcatgcgta cgcccaagac 1320 aagcgatggc cttacttgtc tttaccaatg tgggtttctt ttccagacaa taatattagt 1380 tccttcaaaa tggatttcta ctaaagattg tatctttgtg tttgtatttg atacttgcag 1440 gtcaagaggt gataggccag aggagtgggt tccagaggag attgatacat ccaaagatga 1500 caatgacaat gatgttcatg atgtgtattc ggatgctgct caagatgctg ttgaatcggg 1560 aagcagaaac attgttgata tcttctctat tcattcagct aacaatgata caggtactaa 1620 gtatgattag gctgtctatt ctattgatat aagatcagtt ttagcgtatt tgcttatttc 1680 caaatctatg tgattcccat atttatctct ggtagtatat tgttataaat caaactttcc 1740 ctgtaacaaa cacttttgca gggatcactt atcatactgt ggcagatact ccacccgatt 1800 ctgcgactaa gaagggtaag gcgaagaatt ctactgtttt tgacatttgg aaacatcaat 1860 tcgtggatgc aataacggta aaaatcttca acttaccaag tgttttctag attcttctat 1920 atcctatttt gggcttttga tcattatcaa cacatctttc ttaacttgtt tctcttccta 1980 ttcgtaatca aacagttgga aacatcagaa tcaaagaaag tggatagcat ttatcttcga 2040 atcgcgaaat ctttctggca tttactcctc gccccttgga aactgctttt tgcatttgtg 2100 cccccctgca acattgctca cggttggatc gctttcatct gctctctcct cttcatcagt 2160 ggagtagcct ttgttgtcac aagatttact gaccttataa gctgtgtcac tggtacacac 2220 cctcaccgct ttcaaaaact gaagttataa gattaaacat ttgagctcta aaacattaga 2280 aactcttttc atcttgcagg aataaaccca tatgtgatag cattcacagc actcgcaagt 2340 ggaacttcat ggccagactt agtagcaagt aaaatcgctg cagagcgaca actaaccgca 2400 gattcagcta ttgcaaacat cacctgcagg taaaaatctc aaaacccttt acaaacattg 2460 aagatctttt catgatcttt ttggtgataa attatgcagt aactcggtga acatctatgt 2520 ggggattgga gttccgtggc tgataaacac agtctacaac tactttgcat acagagagcc 2580 tttatacata gaaaacgcta aaggattaag cttttcgctt ctgatattct ttgcgacatc 2640 agtgggatgt atcgtggtgc ttgtgttgag aaggttgatt ataggagctg agcttggagg 2700 tccaaggcta tgggcttggc ttacttctgc ctatttcatg atgctttggg tcgtcttcgt 2760 tgttctttct tctttgaaag tttcaggcgt catatagaag aag 2803 5 474 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana 5 Met Glu Asn Val Val Lys His Ser Arg Lys Val Val Thr Ile Asp Pro 1 5 10 15 Ile Thr Lys Ala Glu Val Ile Thr Tyr Lys Lys Val Trp Asn Phe Thr 20 25 30 Ile Ala Asp Ile Ser Leu Leu Ala Phe Gly Thr Ser Phe Pro Gln Ile 35 40 45 Ser Leu Ala Thr Ile Asp Ala Ile Arg Asn Met Gly Glu Arg Tyr Ala 50 55 60 Gly Gly Leu Gly Pro Gly Thr Leu Val Gly Ser Ala Ala Phe Asp Leu 65 70 75 80 Phe Pro Ile His Ala Val Cys Val Val Val Pro Lys Ala Gly Glu Leu 85 90 95 Lys Lys Ile Ser Asp Leu Gly Val Trp Leu Val Glu Leu Val Trp Ser 100 105 110 Phe Trp Ala Tyr Ile Trp Leu Tyr Ile Ile Leu Glu Val Trp Ser Pro 115 120 125 Asn Val Ile Thr Leu Val Glu Ala Leu Leu Thr Val Leu Gln Tyr Gly 130 135 140 Leu Leu Leu Val His Ala Tyr Ala Gln Asp Lys Arg Trp Pro Tyr Leu 145 150 155 160 Ser Leu Pro Met Ser Arg Gly Asp Arg Pro Glu Glu Trp Val Pro Glu 165 170 175 Glu Ile Asp Thr Ser Lys Asp Asp Asn Asp Asn Asp Val His Asp Val 180 185 190 Tyr Ser Asp Ala Ala Gln Asp Ala Val Glu Ser Gly Ser Arg Asn Ile 195 200 205 Val Asp Ile Phe Ser Ile His Ser Ala Asn Asn Asp Thr Gly Ile Thr 210 215 220 Tyr His Thr Val Ala Asp Thr Pro Pro Asp Ser Ala Thr Lys Lys Gly 225 230 235 240 Lys Ala Lys Asn Ser Thr Val Phe Asp Ile Trp Lys His Gln Phe Val 245 250 255 Asp Ala Ile Thr Val Lys Ile Phe Asn Leu Pro Lys Val Asp Ser Ile 260 265 270 Tyr Leu Arg Ile Ala Lys Ser Phe Trp His Leu Leu Leu Ala Pro Trp 275 280 285 Lys Leu Leu Phe Ala Phe Val Pro Pro Cys Asn Ile Ala His Gly Trp 290 295 300 Ile Ala Phe Ile Cys Ser Leu Leu Phe Ile Ser Gly Val Ala Phe Val 305 310 315 320 Val Thr Arg Phe Thr Asp Leu Ile Ser Cys Val Thr Gly Ile Asn Pro 325 330 335 Tyr Val Ile Ala Phe Thr Ala Leu Ala Ser Gly Thr Ser Trp Pro Asp 340 345 350 Leu Val Ala Ser Lys Ile Ala Ala Glu Arg Gln Leu Thr Ala Asp Ser 355 360 365 Ala Ile Ala Asn Ile Thr Cys Ser Asn Ser Val Asn Ile Tyr Val Gly 370 375 380 Ile Gly Val Pro Trp Leu Ile Asn Thr Val Tyr Asn Tyr Phe Ala Tyr 385 390 395 400 Arg Glu Pro Leu Tyr Ile Glu Asn Ala Lys Gly Leu Ser Phe Ser Leu 405 410 415 Leu Ile Phe Phe Ala Thr Ser Val Gly Cys Ile Val Val Leu Val Leu 420 425 430 Arg Arg Leu Ile Ile Gly Ala Glu Leu Gly Gly Pro Arg Leu Trp Ala 435 440 445 Trp Leu Thr Ser Ala Tyr Phe Met Met Leu Trp Val Val Phe Val Val 450 455 460 Leu Ser Ser Leu Lys Val Ser Gly Val Ile 465 470 6 20 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 6 caygaraarg tncarggngg 20 7 20 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 7 gcccartgna rngcngtrtg 20 8 21 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 8 gggggaacgc ttgaccgatt c 21 9 21 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 9 ccgggcctcc aaaatcatag t 21 10 21 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 10 cccgtgatcg gcgtattgtg a 21 11 21 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 11 gccaactgcc tttgaacttt g 21 12 20 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 12 atgccgctca ccgagatatt 20 13 22 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 13 tcttctactc atggggtttt tc 22 14 35 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 14 ggggtttgaa taagttacca tggcctcaat tctta 35 15 23 DNA Artificial Sequence synthetic oligonucleotide 15 tcttctatat gacgcctgaa act 23 16 17 PRT Artificial Sequence synthetic peptide 16 Cys Glu Glu Ile Asp Thr Ser Lys Asp Asp Asn Asp Asn Asp Val His 1 5 10 15 Asp 17 16 PRT Artificial Sequence synthetic peptide 17 Cys Met Ser Arg Gly Asp Arg Pro Glu Glu Trp Val Pro Glu Glu Ile 1 5 10 15 

What is claimed is:
 1. A transformed plant cell expressing a recombinant polypeptide as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 2. A transgenic plant comprising the transformed plant cell of claim
 1. 3. The transgenic plant of claim 2, wherein the transgenic plant is characterized by a higher dry matter weight when grown in calcium-rich media as compared with a corresponding wild-type plant grown under identical conditions.
 4. The transformed plant cell of claim 1, wherein said recombinant polypeptide is encoded by a nucleic acid molecule set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 or
 4. 